The Global Agenda

This topic, insufferable as it is, requires particular mediation: much information about 'what is going on' is readily available for mass consumption, given, for the first time at a level of general interpretation. Many competing perspectives are available from anywhere in the world, by obvious measures like the networking capacity of the internet. What one is to make of these revelatory phenomena are of one's own individual make of things.

Movements that would tend to corral these inclinations, expressed as the Zeitgeist, truth, or freeman, perspectives, consist of limited expressions of the overall motivation. People, at least some of them, are of the mind to stand up for themselves on levels that they're not supposed to be aware of in the slightest. Or are they? As it stands is that although these perspectives offer much food for thought to the creatively imaginative individual, many involved find themselves mired in one of the other, unable to bring about a functional alternative within the paradigms at hand.

Unfortunately, many involved in the so-called truth movement have taken the essentially neutral information provided by slanted ideological perspectives as valid truth in and of itself, there remains much further informational integration of all the ideas at hand. Nor do I pretend to offer such a complete project in and of itself, only can I present my interpretation of the overall mulitplex of ideas at hand. Again, the general trend in these movements has been to take the information at hand hook line and sinker with the slanted perspective from which it originates. By this token, I infer that information is better considered a quotient to be ascertained from everything in question, from the facts presented to the origins and demarcations of ideas presented as facts, as well as the general temperament and disposition of the manner in which the ideas are presented. Everything is always in question.

From these questions, however, I have gathered as the most functional belief system to entertain in matters of global agendas, that there are indeed nefarious agents in operation that would see to many different impositions of influence and control by many different means. As to an entirely functional perspective that would elucidate the entirety of this agenda, I can by no means pretend to entertain such a feat. As for specific agendas and functionalities that operate within the confines of specifically ascertainable conspiratorial evidence, be they derived from symbolism, scientific method, mystical or otherwise directly real experiences, seem the more plausible hypotheses in contrast to their opposite, that everything is as it should be, with the structure of world political systems easily discernible from an everyday consumption of generally available media products. Fuck that noise.

Too often have ideas, and experiences thereof, been obscured by the convenient interpretation at hand instead of being pursued to their functional limits. This liminal rendering of everyday experience is a functional expression of the dominant cultural ideologies of any given day. On a more personal level, these limitations are either taken on or transcended by the organism wishing to pursue the dominant programming mechanisms or approaching the development of life on its own terms, with imagination of possibilities. In examination of the multifarious capacities that might rightly be called me, I've found that an honest assessment of the reality construct afforded to any entity that happens to be birthed into this modern world, reveals that sinister forces are at work to proscribe specific behaviours that play out in occult rituals and the unfoldment of obscure belief systems. Among these forces are the more obvious figureheads intended to attract the attention of anyone interested in the phenomena, be they the skull & bones, bohemian club, vatican, or royal family, of notable influence indeed. But if anyone interested wishes to proclaim that any single aspect or allegiance is the true motivating factor in any and/or all manifestations of the global agenda as so-called new-world-order, Zionism, the new atlantis, etc., I propose that they are probably wrong from the get go, as more is probably at work than they are aware.

Restricting oneself to entirely 'conspiratorial' realms when seeking information is as limited as only looking to the mainstream media for evidence to inspire answers to the questions of life. Truth is to be found only in the living experience of life, to my mind, informed but not limited by the data at hand.

It is the creative imagination that offers novel development in the idea structures, beliefs, in operation at any given moment. To be taken as honestly as possible, grounded in an emotionally stable interpretation of reality, the connections to be made between the development of western civilization through the deployment of specific ideological patterns, show mainly a tendency towards faith in the conventions of current social paradigms. The question of culture seldom arises in populations that are specially moderated within a comfortable social dichotomy. Same with those entirely embedded within a specifically limited paradigm, whether that be the reality offered by MTV or the 'Truth' movement.

This by no means speaks to the nefariousness or ubiquity of the global agenda in question. It most certainly find expressions in the most heinous of atrocities, from the holocaust to the AIDS epidemic, by my assessment. To link the two directly might take several leaps of the imagination, but the underlying attitude in operation, is to my best analysis, a very similar approach. Devise a scheme to terrorize and murder segments of the population in order to enforce false authority upon frightened masses. Instruct a workable social organism that will follow top-down supervision in the execution of inhumane directives. Maintain a psychological bifurcation in all human organisms between whatever they might truly be and the programmed social realities that offer comfort by complacency and obedience. Construct a plausible deniability that affords those of mediocre intent a haven for their dissent, another group of consumers who need nothing other than constant info-wars and intergalactic reports. Strictly one approach or another will not reveal the only potential interstice in the unfoldment of the global agenda. This break, I propose, is that those complacent in the perpetuation of the nwo, namely you and I, arrest our compliance with it. By taking an honest inner journey, I propose, anyone and everyone will find much more to their lives than previously considered from an attitude of socially deterministic measures.

tbc...

The Inner Journey

Who are we, where do we come from, and what does it mean to be here?

By no means a specific field of study, I'm using the terms inner journey in reference to an individuated human organism's direct and honest experience of immediate sensory reality. This includes the signification that the individual imparts to the experience at hand. The working thesis involved here is that a gross majority of people have decided not to take the inner journey by their own accord and wit, and have rather whole-heartedly accepted a prefabricated worldview in substitution for their unique creative interpretation of reality that is our inherent natural right. I take this to mean that we are each able, if not existentially required, to make the inner journey of our own determination, defining the parameters of our own fundamentally unique experiential matrix.

We barely remember who or what came before this precious moment,
We are choosing to be here right now. Hold on, stay inside
This holy reality, this holy experience.
Choosing to be here in

This body. This body holding me. Be my reminder here that I am not alone in
This body, this body holding me, feeling eternal
All this pain is an illusion.

- Tool, Parabola

We live in a horrifyingly beautiful manifold world, full of different kinds of experiences, no two exactly alike. We communicate things in different ways to attempt an adequate approximation of what that experience feels like to anyone who will listen.

To accept anything (information, perspectives, world-views) willy-nilly, without scrupulous comparison to one's directly perceived experience of life, leads us to constant states of bewilderment, unaware of our connection to the general living matrix of which each of us are an essential piece. As a chosen form of operating in reality, Jean-Paul Sartre called this manner bad faith: a will-full acceptance of known falsehood in order to 'save face,' or 'go with the flow,' as it were. Much of this falsehood, however, is tacitly imposed through constructs of language and ingrained societal limitations of emotional imagination. It is my wish, here, to communicate my perspective on what I take to be an essentially human conundrum, with solutions readily available for all; and although i can't take anyone else's inner journey for them, I may be able to offer suggestions that help people along their own paths, as so many artists, authors, scholars, and scientists have helped me on mine.

This is all I wish to accomplish by communication. Having no special access to truth, all I offer is my honest and creative interpretation of what the unfoldment of my reality means to me. When applicable, I'll provide external context and reference to substantiate actual claims; otherwise, everything presented is my take on life and that alone. Neither am I, or should you, be committed to anything other than this: my (your) honest and creative interpretation of what the unfoldment of my reality means to me (you). That is the only imperative statement I wish to make.

Science, religion, history, politics, media, etc., are taken here as information to be processed, and not perspectives to inform the unfoldment of my reality. Information is necessarily neutral, even the perspectives by which information is generally delivered, be they slanted as much as they are. Offered as belief systems to be held as venerated dogma, information as reality construct is imposed as regular reality to any and all who wish to accept as such. Only when people wholly accept one particular way of interpreting information does the inner journey become occluded. As the sagely Terrence McKenna once put it, “when you believe in one thing it automatically procludes you from believing its' opposite.”

This bad faith, not engaging the inner journey, is most typically manifest in an attitude of being satisfied with the belief systems offered by status quo reality. That is, one feels there's no fault with the fundamentally malicious and unsustainable global reality construct that we are all constantly creating and perpetuating. The inner journey can best be characterized by an internal comparison of one's own emotional life in relation to the unfolding global situation we find ourselves in. Examining how and one feels certain ways towards this idea or that, we may come to realize that the experience of reality is primarily an emotional relation. As the emotions are the functional nexus of soma and psyche, honestly regarding one's bodily sensations and idea structures, social life as an emotional milieu becomes more lucidly interpretable.

“Truth means full contact with oneself as well as well as with the environment. Truth means knowing one's own ways as distinct from the ways of others.” - Wilhelm Reich

Analysis of one's use of language might also be a revealing study, insofar as each have their own unique vocal apparatus, life experience, and general temperament, but for the most part operate within a strictly refined political correctness that I prefer to call living with mutilated language. As no moment is identical to another, we find ourselves in novel situations all the time but are using the same old worn out metaphors to describe them.

Over thinking, over analyzing separates the body from the mind.
Withering my intuition, missing opportunities and I must
Feed my will to feel my moment drawing way outside the lines.

Black then white are all I see in my infancy.
red and yellow then came to be, reaching out to me.
lets me see there is so much more
and beckons me to look through to these infinite possibilities.
As below, so above and beyond, I imagine
drawn outside the lines of reason.
Push the envelope. Watch it bend.

Over thinking, over analyzing separates the body from the mind.
Withering my intuition leaving all these opportunities behind.

Feed my will to feel this moment urging me to cross the line.
Reaching out to embrace the random.
Reaching out to embrace whatever may come.

I embrace my desire to
feel the rhythm, to feel connected
enough to step aside and weep like a widow
to feel inspired, to fathom the power,
to witness the beauty, to bathe in the fountain,
to swing on the spiral
of our divinity and still be a human.

With my feet upon the ground I lose myself
between the sounds and open wide to suck it in,
I feel it move across my skin.
I'm reaching up and reaching out,
I'm reaching for the random or what ever will bewilder me.
And following our will and wind we may just go where no one's been.
We'll ride the spiral to the end and may just go where no one's been.

Spiral out. Keep going, going...

• Tool, Lateralus

Some choose to live comfortably within the proscribed 'reality tunnels,' a la Robert Anton Wilson, while other neophilic types will seek, incessantly, new ways of looking at the world. The language people use to describe their experience, I think, relate directly to the emotional constitution of their temperament, and often times telling of where people are at in their inner journey. And by no means do I wish to imply that anyone has even the capacity to, let alone ability, to comprehend the totality of another human experience; just that some are much more easily read by their language when their words can be accurately correlated with the categorized ideological perspectives that are expressed through their ideas.

In contrast, people who have taken the inner journey for themselves have a varied and creative use of language beyond the simple interpretation of television language, to be derisive. I propose, then, that the inner journey is only approachable having an absolute commitment to avoiding absolutist beliefs, a commitment to living according to life, pulsating with infinite evolutionary potentials. Insofar as beliefs are an operatively functional transactional language to accomplish intended tasks, as in, 'I believe if I do x, y will occur,' they are wholly important and necessary aspect of human reality; however, if beliefs are whole-heartedly accepted as world-view, people's abilities to use them as mechanisms to accomplish specific tasks becomes occluded by those ideological filtration devices. Those beliefs are then used as clubs for clobbering everyone around the believer. Beliefs work towards achieving our 'desired' goals or prevent us from realizing our true goals.

“All truth as a way of living requires an opportunity to express itself freely. It will then grow by its own devices.” - Wilhelm Reich

I am, after many years of intense self-reflection, very confident in asserting that I have at least begun my inner journey. This project will never finish, save for the expiration of my biological vessel. I only say biological as a matter of linguistic convenience, as that study can in no way provide an adequate representation of the human condition, even though it's an essential perspective as physics, chemistry, sociology, and phrenology. All of these linguistic constructs are useful belief systems to advance the understanding of life but cannot be reduced to a homogeneous governing principle. I propose that the best solution to the (post-?) modern conundrum is that everyone begin an inner journey, well expressed by Wilhelm Reich in the following passage from The Murder of Christ:

"There is only one common rule valid in finding the special truth valid for you. That is to learn to listen patiently into yourself, to give yourself a chance to find your own way which is yours and nobody else's way. This leads not into chaos and wild anarchism but ultimately into the realm where the common truth for all is rooted. The ways of approach are manifold and none alike. The source from where the sap of truth is streaming is common to all living beings, far beyond the animal man. This must be so because mall truth is a function of living Life and living Life is basically the same in everything that moves by way of pulsation. Therefore, the basic truth in all teachings of mankind are alike and amount to only one common thing: To find your way to thing you feel when love dearly, or when you create, or when you build your home, or when you give birth to your children or when you look at the stars at night."

I try my best to develop my use language so that I can more adequately express my feelings about the world, by learning new perspectives, doing the research to evidence that way of thinking, and not being afraid to speak my mind, albeit in a more cautious and reserved matter in sensitive circumstances. A sincerely directed effort has been made in regards to answering the questions of 'who we are', 'where we come from', and 'what it means to be here,' and I wish to engage that dialogue. On the other hand, I feel like a seriously concerted effort toward preventing everyone from doing exactly that, the inner journey, is at play in the social reality of 'western' so-called civilization. Language is the general mechanism to relate emotions to social life, bodily sensations to idea structures, and ought be encouraged to develop accordingly, uniquely. The emphasis is heavily in the opposite direction, methinks, as pathological behaviour of so many perversions is considered the norm in 'civilized' society. Through directed social engineering, we've been pigeon-holed into a suicidal death pact with each other so long as we want to consider ourselves special unique snowflakes that deserve the adulation and fame awarded by money and 15 minutes on the television.

Unfortunately, this has spread to almost every part of the world as a ubiquitous ambition, and is far from changing any time soon. Even though there is a strong alternative community in certain regards, I can only wish for more of every community of people to find their own way and notice that it is not the citizenship of the world's political system that matters at all. It is in fact what is holding us all back. Instead, each one's own way if honestly assessed, I believe, would all be complimentary with one another. And that is my functional belief system which I operate towards exactly that end.

A Public Secret Society

The name says it all. As much of a paradox as it might seem to be, it is this meme that I wish to offer to world as a belief 'meta'-program for use in open-source philosophy. Please remember that I've previously defined a belief as a "favoured perspective utilized for its capability to fulfill a conceptual requirement," and not a particular set of absolute convictions. The prefix, 'meta', means change, and the context used here, I seek to change some of the most ingrained belief programs out there, that is absolutist ones. In fact, the public secret society is a sort of tentative commitment to avoid all absolutisms, as they tend to bring along so much conflict and strife. Definitions are tentative, defined as well as possible, and agreed to by those who wish to use the words.

The definition of a society states that it is a group of people who have consensually organized themselves to define their common reality. A tradition that has been passed on since before history, in my estimation, is for a smaller society to occlude particular aspects of reality from the larger societal context. This is what is called a secret society, and whether it is hiding something real and tangible like secrets of the universe or hiding its intentions and operations, its nature is essentially occult by definition. There are many of these societies remaining today, and it is from their wealth of traditions that I seek to gather any fruitful practices that can help me in my adventure.

The advent of all forms of control by an elite group over the masses is precedented by conspiracy. Organizing the wider society along specific parameters dictated by a narrowly self-involved society, the secret one, is the modus operandi of human civilization. Although it is not my belief that the controllers really have control, more like influence, the means of influencing the masses to benefit the elites has been fairly standard for many generations. This is achieved, methinks, by installing a de facto authority that answers to a higher authority, that of the 'controllers.' My proposition is to turn this process on its head.

I wish to establish a public secret society: a group of individuals that have organized a consensus reality that is a higher authority than any other, subject to one golden rule alone, and open to any and all who consent.

It may seem strange to request an individual's consent as a condition for membership in a society; however, if the current cultural milieu has not explicitly stated the requirements and implications of 'citizenship,' as it were, have we as 'persons' actually consented to the society of which we're allegedly a part? I say that this tacit assumption is necessary for the continuation of civilization as it is known today. If everyone was aware that their society was in fact dictated by another society that considers itself separate and superior to the unwashed masses of humanity, there might be a problem...

Let's consider a quote by Nietzsche that might lend some credulity to the assertions I'm proposing: "There is no such thing as fact, only interpretation." Even though I used the word fact in the previous paragraph only goes to illustrate the point that if and when enough people agree upon particular interpretations of certain phenomena they become fact. This agreed upon reality is the consensus world I can envision and is not the current state of affairs in the world today, as far as I've experienced.

Instead, there has been concerted effort by a class of societies operating with an invisible hand that plays a large part in the directing of civilization; and it is this secret orientation from which I wish to take back our usurped human power. If we were to create our own society as independent as possible from any consideration by the statist structures governed by the aforementioned hand, and there is enough support to assert that independence non-violently when confronted by false authorities, then a real society might emerge from the miasma of civilization. Ghandi, when asked what he thought of western civilization, answered "I think it would be a good idea." I say we live up to Ghandi's words.

By using the tactics previously and currently employed by the handlers of the current so-called authorities, how can these methods be called into question? By elucidating the M.O. of the secret societies as they've operated up until now, we would be able to show how their tactics have created authorities and hierarchies at all. The creation of artificial persons being perhaps the most ingrained and insidious, in my opinion, would necessarily be the first to go. By creating a corporate golem and convincing everyone to beleive that the monster bearing the mark of the beast is actually them, the shadow societies have effectively secured their influence over the hearts and minds of all 'persons' on the planet. If we can overstand and overcome this entirely fictitious limitation, as is my intention, then we'd be able to invent and construct our own authority, only public this time...

I think there are many aspects to the idea I'm developing here, and I certainly haven't thought of them all let alone made note of it, but still, there's a kernel of something ready to grow. An idea I'd mentioned in the previous post on evolving ideas is a sort of Universal Declaration of Intent. This might be able to serve as the documentation of people's desired interaction with authority structures.

Another aspect of how open this society needs to be could be achieved in manners of degrees. Just as freemasonry as degrees of membership, so too could the public secret society. For instance, the first degree could be to recognize that the corporations posing as governments so as to legitimize violence are no longer an appropriate coordination for a social contract, but also, that the individual at this level is not yet ready to divest from the system, but ready and able enough to stand up to support a consented to model of social organization. The second degree might entail the active separation from dominator culture by researching, learning, and living into what it means to be a peaceful inhabitant: using one's own wit and elbow grease to make a habitable and hospitable place in the world for oneself, one's kin, and the wider human community. The third degree could then be the post of diplomat who seeks individuals in need of support when 'the man' comes down on them, as no one is free until all our brothers and sisters are freed of their chains, or so some dirty commie put it :).

Well that's the start of the idea.

I would really appreciate any feedback that might be applicable to this idea. I realize it's short and perhaps somewhat trite, but I've been working on a bigger writing project for a few months. Of course every piece of my writing is part and parcel with everything else, I just really wanted to get this idea out there in whatever capacity I can before the wider project comes to fruition.

Thanks anyone everyone who reads this!

Peace,

M

It's Time To Evolve Ideas

"How about a good news story about drugs for once? Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Heres Tom with the Weather...

You see, when we talk these things through, it becomes a little clearer doesn’t it? That’s called logic and it’ll help us all evolve and get on the fucking spaceships and get outta here...

Folks: It's time to evolve ideas. You know, evolution didn't end with us growing thumbs. You do know that, right? Didn't end there. We're at the point, now, where we're going to have to evolve ideas. The reason the world is so fucked up is we're undergoing evolution. And the reason our institutions, our traditional religions, are all crumbling, is because … they're no longer relevant. They're no longer relevant. So it's time for us to create a new philosophy and perhaps even a new religion, you see. And that's okay 'cause that's our right, 'cause we are free children of God with minds who can imagine anything, and that's kind of our role."

----------------------------------------

Even though the late great Bill Hicks summed up the matter quite succinctly and satisfactorily, my take on evolving ideas can be elucidated a bit further in reference to the previous perspectives developed here. The last two posts describe postponing judgment in the case of absolutes, favouring the idea that these mono-logical mental commitments aren't worth the electrolytes expended on their consideration, and that it's about high time for something better than a world 'run by money.'

An idea I'm working on goes something like this: given the current status of our technological development, and, in my opinion, sufficient conditions to provide individuals and communities with the means of producing their sustenance, a political situation allowing for a transitional period between statism and volountarily generated social arrangements is a realistic enough concept for me. The culture we're producing is not in our overall best interest, however, intelligent utilization of the means at hand could point to a more sustainable future.

Let's take for instance the shitty fuckin economy that everyone's blithering about these days. It is, inherently, integrally, and overall a for-profit venture wherein everyone runs around trying to make more money (individuals and nation-states alike) while the entirety is governed by a minority of select interests. People bitching about relatively isolated cases, as in, their own, while the possibility of any situation other than the current gets subsumed by the workload involved in living as a slave. By not challenging the overall status quo, our inviolable human right, we acquiesce to the world-wide slavery of dollar-chasing that sucks up all of our creative freedoms that might otherwise be expressed.

Since the point I'm trying to make here is that a transition to a better situation is not only necessary but possible too, I'll get right to it. A slight understanding of the 'freeman-on-the-land' perspective might help a bit, but my post on The Call, Anarchy, and 'The Party,' sum up well-enough my feelings on statism, which is exactly what I'm proposing we transition from.

Statism: doctrine that holds the 'corporations' people identify as 'Nation-States' to be sovereign entities, and that the 'citizens' who've tacitly rescinded their god-given sovereignty to be reclassified as operational chattel for monetary consideration and not the freely unique flesh-and-blood children of god.

That this is the unquestioned dominant paradigm remains unacceptable to my taste. Instead, why not have an option out? Well, that threatens global hegemony and control for the elites, and is therefore out of the question. But what if enough people demanded it? That's the one thing, I think, that the powers-that-be are really afraid of, and I have a proposition to make. It starts like this:

A Universal Declaration of Intent, in which is stated an outline for common law contractual arrangements, an inherent human right, whereby the five-word maxim: 'cause no harm or loss' can be held to it's full potential. (This is an idea I'm whole-heartedly working on and will develop here further when I've got it better worked out in my head.)

This idea includes that the individual no longer consents to governance, to govern or be governed, and accepts a citizenship-severance package from the appropriate government being severed. This conditional acceptance in no way can include contractual arrangements with the previously governing body, as the fraudulent relationship between fictitious corporate entities (persons and states alike) ends with the severing of citizenship, thus establishing individual sovereignty.

The severance package might be something like this:

A parcel of land, that, by a reasonable scientific measure can support the number of individuals staking their claim.

An energy infrastructure appropriate to the conditions of the environment to provide sustenance.

Seeds and maybe basic livestock.

And, most importantly, the recognition that the human beings involved are no longer subject to the previous governmental structure.

------------------

Well, that's the start of the idea... I guess that's what a blog is for, so that I can develop my ideas conditionally before fully worked out, and still try to communicate them with my peers. (taht's you...)

As an adieu:

Thank you NWO for providing me with the opportunity to recognize the fallibility of your enterprise and the capacity to realize my inner-experience as a freely creative enterprise, that, if nurtured and developed by my healthy perspectives, can eventually come to fruition in my external experience of life. I accept this parcel of land on the conditions that outlined in the Universal Declaration of Intent. No longer will you, as institution, have any dealings with me, as individual. Peace...

Absolutisms...

Religions are like penises.
It's all fine and good to have one,
and do what you will with it in private;
none of my business.
But please don't whip it out in public,
and it's especially inappropriate to jam it down children's throats!
So, please;
Keep it to yourself.

Same thing goes for materialist science and statism.

These three monologues have repressed the development of the human condition in a manner that is unintelligible as of yet. They have also provided for the opportunity for me to be here and comment on their development in such a free and independent manner that is able to communicate thusly, and, therefore invaluable for their contribution to human freedom regardless of their out-datedness...

Now that I've been able to realize that the three mega monoliths of centralized power all have the same root, it is more apparent to me on how to react accordingly. What these institutions of ideology have established is that the responsibility for life is external or exterior or separate somehow from the individual that is experiencing that life. What is more correct and appropriate, however, is that every individual is intimately responsible for the life they live, and if the option of opting for another entity to take over one's inherent responsibility is enacted, the individual in question has abdicated their right to live a free life by their own measure and enabled an authoritarian power structure to take charge of life as they know it.

This is how the so-called Powers-That-Be are 'in control' of world events according to the 'truth movement.' I, personally, don't believe anyone is in control of anything unless someone has given up their ability to control and is therefore controlled. The unfortunate circumstance is that money, as control mechanism, has infiltrated all and every aspect of most life on the globe. As that turns out in every day life, we are all controlled to a certain degree by our use of the money system

No matter how much money goes to 'aid' any impoverished community, the assistance involved is rooted in the control mechanism that will inevitably extract more than was initially invested. This is not an uncommon phenomenon but a constituent part of what makes anything that can appropriately be called a corporation. What that entails is a pathological commitment to the furtherance of financial growth no matter the repercussions, so long as the bottom line is never thwarted from beneath the power structure that prevails.

This is the same for statism, monotheism, and materialist science: they all have the same bottom line that is dollars.

States, as bankrupt facades (especially Canada and the U.S.) operate on the money they borrow from private banks; religions, as morally bankrupt facades (especially the Vatican) operate on the money they coerce from private individuals; mainstream academic science, as bankrupt facade (nuff said?) that operates on any money it can get whether to pursue creationist science or any other absolutist perspective; all of which rely on the idea of, "if we had more money we'd be able to get to the goal we've been promising you for oh so long..."

What all that comes down to is the common denominator of relying on the financial systems of the day to control enough people to provide for their continuance... What would happen if people stopped paying for the non-benefits of committing to particular ideologies and economies? Would they find their own way of operating without the currencies that compel control, or would they falter and fail in response to unforeseen consequences? What, really, is money doing for any of us?

My perspective entails that money ought be reconfigured, if used at all, in considering a sustainable future for the species. By committing to any one of the three monological perspectives elucidated briefly earlier, statism, monotheism, and materialistic science, we have given up our abilities to decide for ourselves what the outcome of our human experience might be, and let it happen without our input in the realm of fictitious financial schemata.

Next post: evolution of ideas....

Put on your PJs!

Listen up everyone! It's time for a new mental exercise, appropriate for the whole family!

By using our brand new innovative product design, the Postpone Judgment Pajamas, anyone can enjoy the infinite worlds of sovereign individuality that brings about your true innate experience as a human on planet earth! All it takes is a minute to calm down and relax, put aside nonsensical belief systems, and enjoy the pleasure of experiencing this exact moment for what it's worth. Think of yourself entering a waking dream-state where there were no absolutes that determined what your imagination might be able to entertain or negate. In a universe that afforded you with immeasurable possibilities, would you not want to exercise those potentials as best as possible? Wouldn't it be great to bring into existence, through imagination, the most ideal and utopian environments, or get rid of those harmfully controlling elements that keep the world in chains?

Well, do I ever have the product for you! And, did I mention, it comes free of charge!? Well you already have all that it takes to calm yourself into a relaxed ecstatic daydream full of untold miracles. All it takes is abandoning the ways you've done things before, just for a moment of course 'cause we're only dreaming here, and imagining something different, something better. These pajamas can bring you to a state of total uninhibited creativity where you're able to tap into the creative forces of the cosmos and bring into your life the most amazing prophecies that you, and only you, can realize in immanent experiential reality!! Only in such an altered state of consciousness can the limits of truth be extended slightly further than before. When you wear these PJs the opportunities for evolution become apparent to freely conscious entities that seek to ameliorate and reconcile their disadvantageous relationship with the ecosystem as a whole. PJs make everyone happier and healthier by letting a little bit of living room between what the individual is and what keeps the individual safe. Better balance comes from better pajamas.

All it takes is to relax your roll a little, dawg... Let it slide, and don't get too worked up. Try and take things from a more grounded level, not putting yourself higher or lower than anyone or any- thing, for that matter. No one and no- thing has absolute arbitration over your existence. This is what is revealed when you chill out in your PeeJays...

And then, something happens that calls you back to everyday reality...

an unacceptable occurrence compels reaction: Absolutisms haven taken hold of the entire world!?!? It gets very difficult to adorn the pragmatic pajamas of postponed judgment when all around one finds the melodramatic mediocrity of melancholic materialist monotheism. All of the dominating ideologies demand strict adherence or downright dismissal, anything in between considered a moralized inferiority by dogmatists.

Fuck that... There's always another path. So long as we hold that to be the closest margin of absolutes, that is, there are absolutely none to be determined by linguistic statements alone, there are infinite permutations for ideas to evolve into.

[Philo-sophy] or (Phi-lo-sophy)

The etymological analysis of the word philosophy has never satisfied me for many reasons. As 'the discipline to unite all disciplines,' or so I've often considered it, academic philosophy seems hardly appropriate enough in and of itself to deserve the title 'love of wisdom,' let alone be bestowed with something better. My very uninformed assessment (I studied undergrad for four years...) of the higher academic levels is that they're a bunch of pandering ninnies preying on corpses of dead idols.

as per online etymological dictionary:

c.1300, from O.Fr. filosofie (12c.), from L. philosophia, from Gk. philosophia "love of knowledge, wisdom," from philo- "loving" + sophia "knowledge, wisdom," from sophis "wise, learned."

and the omniscient god Wiki, philo- and -sophia:

Philo-, a prefix form of -phil-, from the Greek for "love of", e.g. philosophy

Sophia (Σοφíα, Greek for "wisdom") is a central term in Hellenistic philosophy and religion, Platonism, Gnosticism, Orthodox Christianity, Esoteric Christianity, as well as Christian mysticism. Sophiology is a philosophical concept regarding wisdom, as well as a theological concept regarding the wisdom of God.

The undergraduate courses and all other professors could easily be called philosophers by this definition, but, these constituent parts could not contain the whole of what I experienced in my interaction with the ideas presented in the upper level philosophy classes of two particular professors. I was getting more out of it than I was supposed to, methinks, because my ideas were growing too rapidly to be presented within the limited parameters of twenty page term papers. I wanted to be working on an honours project that would sum up my undergraduate learnings in an expressive and explicative way, and I tried to get it going, but the faculty wasn't ready for that. What they told me was that I'd better keep my focus on the classes at hand and not write about psychedelics any more because it's not appropriate at the graduate level, and that's what they're there for was to get their students ready for grad school. This tirade is not to blame them for my leaving academia, because that's one of the best choices I ever made, but to put into context that their academic pursuits were just that, academic pursuits, and would not or could not compromise the essential political nature of institutionalized realities. I had more to do with my mind and life.

Somewhere along the way I've reinterpreted how I define philosophy.

That Sophia was goddess from some time and we have a particular fascination with it does not suffice my awe and wonder with the mysteries of consciousness.

And what is the suffix -philia generally associated with? Negatively sexual words like corprophilia, the 'love' of shit, necrophilia, pedophilia... So is philosophilia like fucking an old dead goddess or something? Hardly appropriate.

And now, for something completely different, I have a new way of philosophizing (eww, that's sick bro) that will show us out of this etymological maze.

Let's consider the world comprised of three distinct parts instead of two:

[philo-] and [-sophia] becomes [phi-], [-lo-], [-sophia]

phi is the golden ratio, a transcendental number of a ratio found everywhere in nature from the proportions of the human body to the shape of the spiral arms of the galaxy, 1:1.618.......

This ratio is encoded in the logarithmic spirals of shells and tornadoes, the dimensions of credit cards and many corporate logos, the teachings of mystery schools since the first Egyptian dynasties (and I think before, too...) to name only a few amongst many. I would bet that lifetimes have been spent trying to examine this phenomenon without ever coming close to exhausting the multifarious manifestations of this essential fractal pattern. If you're interested in starting it out I'd recommend looking up 'sacred geometry' as it's a more than compelling idea that reaches out far and beyond what is able to be entertained in academic circles. The circles of sacred geometry constitute the foundation of our experience called reality.

Well, if we've got a place to start to look at the basis of life, the universe, and everything, and it's a simple-enough starting point like the 21st letter of the Greek alphabet, and been known by humans for thousands of years, well, let's get started? I've only just begun,

and,

- lo - and behold,

I find myself on the path to -sophia. Instead of postulating fantastical fictions based on outdated moral relativities, let's look at something that can be found at every level of our experience as consciousness! Doesn't this seem like a better foundation for an attempt towards wisdom than a sickly fetish with dead ideas?

Philosophy, to me,

Φ, behold, wisdom...

perspectives that include this most intrinsic of ratios are better equipped to withstand the awe and wonder imparted by experiencing the beatific wisdom contained therein.

peace...